Ayahuasca is not a shortcut.

Next to the cup, there is always a bucket.

That might be the most honest definition of ayahuasca.

Not because ayahuasca is only nausea and vomiting. It isn't. People talk about it in ways that sound like being born again: seeing old memories, facing fear, forgiving a father, crying for a child who is no longer there, feeling the forest as something alive, not a green background for a photo.

But the bucket is there.

And that is good. Because it interrupts the clean, Instagram version of the story: fly to Costa Rica or Peru, sit in a maloca for a few nights, drink a cup, and return as a better version of yourself.

If only life were that polite.

Ayahuasca is usually made from the vine Banisteriopsis caapi and a DMT-containing leaf, such as Psychotria viridis. Chemically, the vine contains compounds that temporarily inhibit the MAO-A enzyme and allow DMT to become psychoactive when taken orally.

That explanation is necessary.

But it is not enough.

In many Amazonian traditions, ayahuasca is not just "oral DMT." The vine is a teacher. A medicine. A relationship. A force that takes shape through song, intention, diet, abstinence, the body, fear, memory, the group, and the person holding the ceremony.

The medicine is not only what is in the cup.

The medicine is the container the cup sits inside.

And the container does more work than we think.

People usually turn to ayahuasca when something in ordinary life has not worked. Depression. Grief. Addiction. Trauma. A crisis of meaning. Fear of death. The exhaustion of everything looking fine while nothing actually feels fine.

These are not small reasons.

So they should not be met with small answers.

One person sees something like hell in ceremony and later says it was the most important night of their life. Another vomits, trembles, becomes afraid of their own mind, and is still weak the following week. One says ayahuasca gave them what they needed, not what they wanted. Another says it ruined their life.

All of these can be true at the same time.

The trouble starts when we only like one of these stories.

If we are in love with miracles, we treat the risks as an inconvenience to the story.

If we are in love with fear, we treat meaning as naivety.

Both paths are lazy.

Science, for now, has only a small picture of this large room. One small randomized study of 29 patients with treatment-resistant depression found that a single dose of ayahuasca could produce rapid antidepressant effects; by day seven, the ayahuasca group showed a better response than the placebo group.

That matters.

But it is not a miracle.

The sample was small. The follow-up was short. And we still do not know how much of the effect comes from the chemistry of the plants, how much from the music, expectation, support, ritual, group, surrender, or the conversations after ceremony.

This sentence should be written on the door of every clinic, retreat, podcast, and motivational post:

"Hope is not evidence."

Of course, the absence of complete evidence does not mean the absence of value.

Many human things first appear in stories, and then research slowly follows them. People report that their relationship with themselves, family, grief, body, and nature has changed. Some speak of quitting or reducing substance use. Some say years of therapy had not opened the door, and one night, something opened.

Maybe.

But opening the door is not the same as walking through it.

After the ceremony, life is waiting. The same partner. The same work. The same habit. The same morning anxiety. The same phone. The same body. The same wound that may now be seen more clearly, but still has to be lived with.

This is where the unglamorous word "integration" becomes more important than the ceremony itself.

Seeing the cosmic mother is not hard.

Calling your mother is hard.

Seeing a wounded child in a vision is not hard.

Changing the behavior that helped you survive for thirty years is hard.

Crying in the dark is not hard.

Telling the truth in the light is hard.

That is why, if ayahuasca starts anything, it usually starts it after the ceremony. In the first few days, a person may be more open, softer, more vulnerable, and more suggestible. That can be an opportunity. It can also be a danger.

An opportunity, if the person rests, writes, talks with a therapist or someone trustworthy, returns to the body, postpones major decisions, and learns the difference between "the message of the ceremony" and "the high after the ceremony."

A danger, if they think every image is a divine instruction.

Visions do not always lie.

But they are not always instructions either.

Now the unromantic part.

Ayahuasca is not for everyone.

Not in the way people say that to make a sentence sound prettier. It really is not for everyone.

People with a history of psychosis, mania, bipolar I disorder, seizures, serious heart disease, uncontrolled blood pressure, pregnancy, medical frailty, or use of certain medications may be at serious risk. Antidepressants, MAOIs, lithium, stimulants, MDMA, dextromethorphan, some migraine medications, some opioids, and other substances can create dangerous interactions.

This is not the place for heroics.

If participating in the ceremony requires you to hide a medication, minimize your medical history, or trust someone who says, "Don't worry, Mother Ayahuasca will take care of it," then the ceremony has not started yet, but the lesson has.

The lesson is: leave.

Or at least do not go further.

The risk is not only in the molecule.

It is also in the people.

Ayahuasca opens people. The body gets weak. The mind gets soft. Boundaries sometimes come down. A person may cry, tremble, want to be touched, or not know what they want at all.

This state makes good facilitators necessary.

And bad facilitators dangerous.

A serious retreat should have medical and psychological screening. It should ask about medications. It should know the composition of the brew. It should have an emergency plan. The ratio of staff to participants should make sense. No one should be pressured to drink more. Touch should be clear, consensual, and limited. Sexual relationships between facilitators and participants should be forbidden. There should be follow-up after the ceremony.

If someone is selling guaranteed healing, they are selling something else.

If they say one night equals ten years of therapy, they probably need therapy themselves.

If no one asks about medication, blood pressure, family history of psychosis, or an emergency plan, that silence is not part of the ceremony.

It is a red flag.

Then comes culture. And this part is not decorative.

Ayahuasca is not a wellness brand the West discovered. Many Amazonian traditions and Brazilian churches have built different generations, years, and worldviews with it: Shipibo-Konibo, Shuar, Kofan, Siona, Tukano, Ashaninka, Huni Kuin, Santo Daime, União do Vegetal, and others.

Even saying "the ayahuasca tradition" is a little lazy.

Traditions.

Plural.

A Shipibo ceremony in Peru, a Santo Daime work in Brazil, a yagé ceremony in Colombia, and a luxury retreat in Costa Rica are not the same thing. The music is different. The theology is different. Authority is different. Dosage is different. Economics are different. Ethics are different.

When tourism enters, money enters too. Money can help local communities. It can also turn everything into performance: sacred language on a brochure, Indigenous symbols on a website, a healer pressured to perform the version foreigners expect, profit for the company, cost for the forest.

Here, the right question is not, "Is ayahuasca authentic?"

The right question is:

Who decides?

Who benefits?

Who carries the risk?

Who remains with the consequences after the tourist goes home?

Respect means not treating these questions as mood killers.

Respect means understanding that a relational medicine cannot be consumed like a self-improvement product.

The law is not simple either. In the United States, DMT is a Schedule I substance, although some churches have received protection or exemptions under religious freedom frameworks. That protection is not automatic. In Brazil, religious use is accepted within certain frameworks, but commercialization is problematic. In Peru, traditional knowledge and use of ayahuasca has been declared cultural heritage, but something being legal or common does not make it safe. In Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, the situation depends on the country, enforcement, composition, and religious claim.

So the sentence "ayahuasca is legal there" is usually a dangerous sentence.

Legality is not a medical protocol.

So what should you do?

If you are only curious, do not go yet.

Curiosity is not enough fuel for this kind of journey.

If you are looking for healing, start with therapy. Not because ayahuasca has no value. Because a serious wound needs a serious container.

If you still feel this path is yours, go slower. Read about the traditions. Read about the risks. Speak with a doctor who understands drug interactions. Ask the center or group the boring questions: How does screening work? Who should not participate? What is in the brew? How many staff are watching how many people? What is the emergency plan? What is the policy on touch and sexual contact? What support exists after ceremony? Where does the money go? What is your relationship with the source community?

Vague answers are answers.

Pressure to hurry is an answer.

Being offended by questions is an answer.

Ayahuasca may shake some people. It may open a window. It may bring a person face to face with grief, love, fear, the body, family, death, and nature in a way they do not forget for years.

But no plant accepts responsibility for our life on our behalf.

This may be the hardest and most respectful thing one can say about ayahuasca.

If the medicine is real, it does not remove your work.

It shows you your work.

The Libélula team
Written on the land

Comments 0

No account needed · Be respectful

    Keep reading.

    All posts →